Newest Pawleys Island church sex offender lawsuit highlights two teachers who blew the whistle to authorities

Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

GEORGETOWN COUNTY, S.C. (BFMG) — Two more Georgetown County parents have filed a civil lawsuit. .pdf accusing a Pawleys Island church and its Christian academy of knowingly allowing a registered sex offender to work around children for years, in violation of South Carolina childcare law and probation restrictions.

The complaint, filed July 21 in the Georgetown County Court of Common Pleas, lists John Roe and Jane Roe as plaintiffs, identified by pseudonyms to protect their privacy and that of their minor child, J.D. The lawsuit names Warren Spence Perry, Pawleys Island Community Church, Pawleys Island Christian Academy, former academy director Jennifer “Niki” Howard, former senior pastor Donald James Williams and church employee Virginia Lee “Ginny” Williams as defendants.

Allegations against church, academy and leaders

According to the filing, Pawleys Island Christian Academy is described as a registered church-based childcare and school serving preschool and elementary-aged children under South Carolina Child Care Registration No. 18530. The plaintiffs allege the church and academy accepted responsibility for the care, custody and protection of children on campus, including J.D.

The lawsuit contends Perry, a convicted sex offender, was allowed to perform recurring custodial, maintenance and caregiver-type tasks on the church and school grounds, bringing him into classrooms, childcare rooms and outdoor play areas where he interacted directly with children. The complaint asserts that by assigning Perry regular duties and allowing him to develop familiarity with families and staff, church and academy leaders “clothed him with the apparent authority of a trusted representative” despite knowing his criminal history.

Warren Spencer Perry

The plaintiffs accuse Pawleys Island Community Church, the academy and individual leaders of negligence, gross negligence, reckless conduct and intentional misconduct in selecting, authorizing, retaining and supervising Perry. They allege the defendants failed to conduct required background checks, failed to follow statutory screening rules for childcare workers and failed to warn teachers and parents that a registered sex offender was regularly present on campus.

Perry’s conviction and probation conditions

Court documents say Perry was arrested and later convicted of Sexual Exploitation of a Minor for conduct that occurred around 2020, becoming a registered sex offender under South Carolina law. The complaint alleges he was placed on probation under the South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services with conditions limiting his contact with children.

Despite that status, the parents assert, Perry became a regular presence at Pawleys Island Community Church and its academy beginning around 2020, volunteering and performing maintenance work while children were present. The complaint says students and staff knew him as “Mr. Warren,” and that he was frequently observed working in areas used by preschool and elementary-aged children.

The lawsuit further alleges church leaders had direct, personal knowledge of Perry’s sex-offender registration and probation status. According to the filing, Williams, then the senior pastor, acknowledged in a public meeting after Perry’s later arrest that he and other leaders were aware of Perry’s history and chose to limit that information to a small group, leaving classroom teachers and many parents in the dark.

South Carolina childcare law cited in complaint

The complaint cites multiple South Carolina statutes that bar licensed or registered childcare facilities from employing or allowing as caregivers anyone who is required to register, or is registered, on the state or national sex offender registries. It references provisions requiring fingerprint-based criminal history checks, sex-offender registry checks and child-abuse registry searches for people working in childcare settings, with periodic rechecks every five years.

Plaintiffs argue these laws reflect the state’s recognition that registered sex offenders pose an unacceptable risk to children and say the church and academy violated the “protective purposes” of those statutes by allowing Perry to function as an employee, staff member, custodian or volunteer in proximity to minors. They claim these statutory violations amount to negligence and negligence per se under South Carolina law.

The filing also asserts claims for negligent supervision and premises liability, arguing the defendants created an “unreasonably dangerous circumstance” by knowingly granting a registered sex offender access, authority and familiarity with children on the school campus, then failing to implement adequate safeguards or warn families.

Teacher reports and probation investigation

According to the complaint, the situation came to a head in July 2026 when former academy teacher Allie Osborne discovered Perry’s listing on the South Carolina Sex Offender Registry. Osborne and another teacher identified as Erika allegedly reported their concerns to Howard and Williams and were told church leadership already knew about Perry’s status.

The filing says Erika then reported Perry’s ongoing access to children to law enforcement or probation authorities, triggering an investigation into his volunteer activities on the church and school grounds. Investigators ultimately arrested Perry on allegations he violated his probation by working in proximity to children.

In the aftermath, Williams reportedly held a meeting with church members where he acknowledged leaders knew of Perry’s history, believed — incorrectly, according to the complaint — that he was complying with probation conditions, and had decided not to inform classroom teachers or many parents. Williams later resigned as senior pastor, and local news outlets have reported that Williams, Howard, Ginny Williams and Perry were arrested on related charges following the investigation.

Claims of emotional harm and request for damages

The parents say their child suffered “serious injuries and damages” that are still being evaluated and that the family has experienced severe emotional distress and mental anguish from learning that a registered sex offender had access to J.D. The complaint alleges the child will likely require medical and forensic evaluations, and that the parents have independent claims under South Carolina law tied to their child’s injuries.

The lawsuit seeks actual and punitive damages, with the amount to be determined by a jury, along with costs of the action and other relief the court deems appropriate. It demands a jury trial on all issues, and lists multiple causes of action, including negligence, negligent supervision, negligent selection and retention, premises liability and intentional misconduct.

Wider scrutiny of Pawleys Island Community Church

The case joins a growing number of civil actions and public scrutiny surrounding Pawleys Island Community Church and its academy. Earlier this month, a separate class-action lawsuit was filed on behalf of other families alleging the church and school allowed Perry, a convicted sex offender, to volunteer near children without adequate screening or disclosure to parents. Local and regional outlets have reported on both lawsuits and the criminal investigation, noting community outrage and calls for accountability.

Georgetown County Sheriff Carter Weaver has said the criminal investigation remains active and has urged anyone with information to contact his office. The civil suit filed by John Roe and Jane Roe is one of the first to lay out, in detail, how the family says church and school leaders knowingly allowed a registered sex offender to remain embedded in a Christian childcare setting — and the harm they allege followed.

Powered By EmbedPress

Copyright 2026 Blunt Force Media Group, LLC. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Share this article

TIPS AND INFORMATION REPORTING GUIDELINES

Blunt Force Media Group is committed to providing a safe and confidential platform for individuals to report tips and information related to criminal activities. To ensure the integrity and effectiveness of our tip submission process, we have established the following policy:

Confidentiality and Anonymity

Confidentiality 
We take the confidentiality of our tipsters seriously. Personal information provided will be kept confidential and will not be shared without explicit consent, except as required by law.

Anonymity
If you wish to remain anonymous, you may do so. Please be aware that maintaining complete anonymity may limit our ability to follow up for additional information or clarification.

Accuracy and Detail

Provide Specific Information
To assist in the investigation, please provide as much detailed and specific information as possible, including names, dates, locations, and descriptions of the criminal activity.

Supporting Evidence
If available, please include any supporting evidence, such as photographs, documents, or recordings. Ensure that any evidence submitted does not contain malware or other harmful software.

Legal Compliance

False Reporting
Submitting false information or intentionally misleading tips is a criminal offense and may be subject to legal action. We take the accuracy of the information seriously to protect the integrity of our investigations.

Mandatory Reporting
Certain types of information, such as those involving child abuse or imminent threats to safety, may require us to report to appropriate authorities as mandated by law

Submission Methods

Online Form
Tips can be submitted through our secure online form available on our website. Ensure all required fields are completed accurately.

Phone
Tips can also be submitted via our hotline for specific cases. When a hotline for a case is established, callers will speak to a live representative who will collect the information and submit it to the appropriate jurisdiction to investigate the lead. Calls are recorded for quality and verification purposes.

Mail
For those preferring traditional methods, tips cannot be mailed to our postal address and will not be accepted.

Follow-Up and Feedback

Acknowledgment
Upon submission, you will receive a reference number for your tip. Keep this number for any future correspondence regarding the tip.

Follow-Up
We may contact you for additional information if you have provided contact details. If you wish to remain anonymous, ensure your initial submission is as comprehensive as possible.

Feedback
While we cannot provide detailed feedback on ongoing investigations, we value your contribution and will do our best to acknowledge receipt and update you where appropriate.

Data Protection

Data Security
We employ robust security measures to protect the data submitted through our platform. All information is stored securely and accessed only by authorized personnel.

Retention Policy
Information provided will be retained for as long as necessary to fulfill the purposes outlined in this policy and comply with legal requirements.

Disclaimer

No Liability
Blunt Force Media Group is not liable for any consequences resulting from the submission of tips. By submitting information, you acknowledge that you have read, understood, and agree to this policy.

Contact Us

For any legal questions or concerns regarding this policy or others, please contact us at: Email: legal@bluntforcemedia.com